<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Everybody&#039;s Wrong But Me &#187; British Columbia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.vancf.net/category/issues-politics/british-columbia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.vancf.net</link>
	<description>Ideas &#38; ideals of a Progressive French Canadian living on the West Coast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:08:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>I predicted BC&#8217;s current political situation</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2010/12/07/i-predicted-bcs-current-political-situation/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2010/12/07/i-predicted-bcs-current-political-situation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 03:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[provincial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sterk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last March, I predicted BC&#8217;s current political situation in my column for L&#8217;Express du Pacifique.  I wrote that two of BC&#8217;s three main parties would have new leaders by the next election.   The original article, in French, can be found here: http://www.lexpress.org/opinion/le-temps-est-il-venu-pour-de-nouveaux-chefs/ I do not understand why many seem to be surprised by the current <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2010/12/07/i-predicted-bcs-current-political-situation/#more-345" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last March, I predicted BC&#8217;s current political situation in my column for L&#8217;Express du Pacifique.  I wrote that two of BC&#8217;s three main parties would have new leaders by the next election.   The original article, in French, can be found here: http://www.lexpress.org/opinion/le-temps-est-il-venu-pour-de-nouveaux-chefs/ I do not understand why many seem to be surprised by the current <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2010/12/07/i-predicted-bcs-current-political-situation/#more-345" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2010/12/07/i-predicted-bcs-current-political-situation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christy Clark on BC-STV</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/11/christy-clark-on-bc-stv/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/11/christy-clark-on-bc-stv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you just have one thing to watch before making your mind on the referendum, I recommend Christy Clark&#8217;s comment.  It is available here on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhccpzI4lbQ If you can&#8217;t see the video, the text is available on cknw&#8217;s website here: http://www.cknw.com/blog/christys_bc_15/blogentry.aspx?BlogEntryID=10031397 Frédéric Van Caenegem</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you just have one thing to watch before making your mind on the referendum, I recommend Christy Clark&#8217;s comment.  It is available here on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhccpzI4lbQ If you can&#8217;t see the video, the text is available on cknw&#8217;s website here: http://www.cknw.com/blog/christys_bc_15/blogentry.aspx?BlogEntryID=10031397 Frédéric Van Caenegem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/11/christy-clark-on-bc-stv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BC-STV ridings make sense</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/11/bc-stv-ridings-make-sense/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/11/bc-stv-ridings-make-sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FPTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerrymandering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ridings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My last of three short texts regarding the referendum One aspect on which very little has been written on is the ridings under BC-STV and FPTP electoral systems. One quick look at the map will show one thing very quickly: the ridings are bigger under BC-STV! That being said, are they better? The current system <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/11/bc-stv-ridings-make-sense/#more-266" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My last of three short texts regarding the referendum One aspect on which very little has been written on is the ridings under BC-STV and FPTP electoral systems. One quick look at the map will show one thing very quickly: the ridings are bigger under BC-STV! That being said, are they better? The current system <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/11/bc-stv-ridings-make-sense/#more-266" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/11/bc-stv-ridings-make-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another dumb decision by Translink</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/10/another-dumb-decision-by-translink/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/10/another-dumb-decision-by-translink/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 18:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Translink]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Congratulation to Translink&#8217;s unelected board to have schedule they Annual Meeting on Election day (May 12). This decision ensures there will be as little as possible media coverage regarding decisions taken on that day. A day that has been scheduled and made public just a few years ago by the provincial legislature! Frédéric Van Caenegem</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulation to Translink&#8217;s unelected board to have schedule they Annual Meeting on Election day (May 12). This decision ensures there will be as little as possible media coverage regarding decisions taken on that day. A day that has been scheduled and made public just a few years ago by the provincial legislature! Frédéric Van Caenegem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/10/another-dumb-decision-by-translink/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watch this before you vote!</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/08/watch-this-before-you-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/08/watch-this-before-you-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 19:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christy Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Before you vote, watch this video and tell all your friends: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhccpzI4lbQ Few have been as honest and insightful as former Deputy Premier Christy Clark on CKNW yesterday. Here’s the video everybody needs to see before they vote in Tuesday’s provincial referendum. As Christy says, this is the most important vote we’ll cast. Please forward <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/08/watch-this-before-you-vote/#more-256" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before you vote, watch this video and tell all your friends: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhccpzI4lbQ Few have been as honest and insightful as former Deputy Premier Christy Clark on CKNW yesterday. Here’s the video everybody needs to see before they vote in Tuesday’s provincial referendum. As Christy says, this is the most important vote we’ll cast. Please forward <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/08/watch-this-before-you-vote/#more-256" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/08/watch-this-before-you-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>STV vs MMP</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/07/stv-vs-mmp/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/07/stv-vs-mmp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The second of three short text about the upcoming referendum. Some MMP supporter say vote no for STV, because we are going to have instead a supposedly better system in MMP. While I certainly respect that some people may prefer MMP to STV, I urge voters to actually vote regarding the two systems proposed on <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/07/stv-vs-mmp/#more-252" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second of three short text about the upcoming referendum. Some MMP supporter say vote no for STV, because we are going to have instead a supposedly better system in MMP. While I certainly respect that some people may prefer MMP to STV, I urge voters to actually vote regarding the two systems proposed on <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/07/stv-vs-mmp/#more-252" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/07/stv-vs-mmp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Studies 11</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/05/social-studies-11/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/05/social-studies-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 06:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A student asked me a few questions about BC-STV for her Social Studies 11 course a few days ago. Here were my answers! &gt; When you first time heard about BC-STV? In 2004, when the Citizens&#8217; Assembly on Electoral Reform (http://www.citizensassembly.bc.ca/) decided that STV should be used for British Columbia. I didn&#8217;t follow that much <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/05/social-studies-11/#more-247" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A student asked me a few questions about BC-STV for her Social Studies 11 course a few days ago. Here were my answers! &gt; When you first time heard about BC-STV? In 2004, when the Citizens&#8217; Assembly on Electoral Reform (http://www.citizensassembly.bc.ca/) decided that STV should be used for British Columbia. I didn&#8217;t follow that much <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/05/social-studies-11/#more-247" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/05/social-studies-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BC-STV and the Indo-Canadian vote</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/04/bc-stv-and-the-indo-canadian-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/04/bc-stv-and-the-indo-canadian-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 07:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-Canadian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punjabi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>BC-STV and the Indo-Canadian vote My first of three short articles regarding BC-STV Before the referendum on May 6th. This article is about electioneering, a discipline that is absolutely despicable but also unfortunately very efficient! There is a general negative attitude towards BC-STV in the Indo-Canadian community.  The reason comes from an association of the <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/04/bc-stv-and-the-indo-canadian-vote/#more-243" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BC-STV and the Indo-Canadian vote My first of three short articles regarding BC-STV Before the referendum on May 6th. This article is about electioneering, a discipline that is absolutely despicable but also unfortunately very efficient! There is a general negative attitude towards BC-STV in the Indo-Canadian community.  The reason comes from an association of the <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/04/bc-stv-and-the-indo-canadian-vote/#more-243" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/04/bc-stv-and-the-indo-canadian-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CILS-FM</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/22/cils-fm/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/22/cils-fm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CILS-FM]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I was interviewed about BC-STV (or VUT: Vote Unique Transférable) on CILS-FM 107.9 (a French-language community radio based in Victoria) earlier today. It will be rebroadcast. More info on the French side: http://blogue.vancf.net/2009/04/22/cils-fm/ Frédéric Van Caenegem</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was interviewed about BC-STV (or VUT: Vote Unique Transférable) on CILS-FM 107.9 (a French-language community radio based in Victoria) earlier today. It will be rebroadcast. More info on the French side: http://blogue.vancf.net/2009/04/22/cils-fm/ Frédéric Van Caenegem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/22/cils-fm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On May 12</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/15/on-may-12/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/15/on-may-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 03:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My latest comment published in today&#8217;s 24hrs newspaper.  It is an unusually very neutral comment from myself. On May 12, the referendum on electoral reform will be more important than the election itself. The election will impact us for the next few years; the referendum will impact us for the next few decades at the <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/15/on-may-12/#more-236" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My latest comment published in today&#8217;s 24hrs newspaper.  It is an unusually very neutral comment from myself. On May 12, the referendum on electoral reform will be more important than the election itself. The election will impact us for the next few years; the referendum will impact us for the next few decades at the <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/15/on-may-12/#more-236" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/15/on-may-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

