<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Everybody&#039;s Wrong But Me &#187; referendum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.vancf.net/tag/referendum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.vancf.net</link>
	<description>Ideas &#38; ideals of a Progressive French Canadian living on the West Coast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:08:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rex Murphy and Québec sovereignty</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2011/06/07/rex-murphy-and-quebec-sovereignty/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2011/06/07/rex-murphy-and-quebec-sovereignty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 05:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50%]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50%+1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Layton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sovereignty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Recently I was greatly surprise to hear Rex Murphy criticizing Jack Layton&#8217;s position that the NDP will respect Québec decisions regarding a possible referendum on sovereignty.  While one can disagree with the independence of Québec, one can surely respect an opponent&#8217;s decision’s, I don&#8217;t see what is &#8220;weak&#8221; about that! Rex is quick to tell <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2011/06/07/rex-murphy-and-quebec-sovereignty/#more-358" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently I was greatly surprise to hear Rex Murphy criticizing Jack Layton&#8217;s position that the NDP will respect Québec decisions regarding a possible referendum on sovereignty.  While one can disagree with the independence of Québec, one can surely respect an opponent&#8217;s decision’s, I don&#8217;t see what is &#8220;weak&#8221; about that! Rex is quick to tell <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2011/06/07/rex-murphy-and-quebec-sovereignty/#more-358" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2011/06/07/rex-murphy-and-quebec-sovereignty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christy Clark on BC-STV</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/11/christy-clark-on-bc-stv/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/11/christy-clark-on-bc-stv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you just have one thing to watch before making your mind on the referendum, I recommend Christy Clark&#8217;s comment.  It is available here on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhccpzI4lbQ If you can&#8217;t see the video, the text is available on cknw&#8217;s website here: http://www.cknw.com/blog/christys_bc_15/blogentry.aspx?BlogEntryID=10031397 Frédéric Van Caenegem</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you just have one thing to watch before making your mind on the referendum, I recommend Christy Clark&#8217;s comment.  It is available here on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhccpzI4lbQ If you can&#8217;t see the video, the text is available on cknw&#8217;s website here: http://www.cknw.com/blog/christys_bc_15/blogentry.aspx?BlogEntryID=10031397 Frédéric Van Caenegem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/11/christy-clark-on-bc-stv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BC-STV ridings make sense</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/11/bc-stv-ridings-make-sense/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/11/bc-stv-ridings-make-sense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FPTP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerrymandering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ridings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My last of three short texts regarding the referendum One aspect on which very little has been written on is the ridings under BC-STV and FPTP electoral systems. One quick look at the map will show one thing very quickly: the ridings are bigger under BC-STV! That being said, are they better? The current system <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/11/bc-stv-ridings-make-sense/#more-266" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My last of three short texts regarding the referendum One aspect on which very little has been written on is the ridings under BC-STV and FPTP electoral systems. One quick look at the map will show one thing very quickly: the ridings are bigger under BC-STV! That being said, are they better? The current system <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/11/bc-stv-ridings-make-sense/#more-266" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/11/bc-stv-ridings-make-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>STV vs MMP</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/07/stv-vs-mmp/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/07/stv-vs-mmp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The second of three short text about the upcoming referendum. Some MMP supporter say vote no for STV, because we are going to have instead a supposedly better system in MMP. While I certainly respect that some people may prefer MMP to STV, I urge voters to actually vote regarding the two systems proposed on <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/07/stv-vs-mmp/#more-252" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second of three short text about the upcoming referendum. Some MMP supporter say vote no for STV, because we are going to have instead a supposedly better system in MMP. While I certainly respect that some people may prefer MMP to STV, I urge voters to actually vote regarding the two systems proposed on <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/07/stv-vs-mmp/#more-252" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/07/stv-vs-mmp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BC-STV and the Indo-Canadian vote</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/04/bc-stv-and-the-indo-canadian-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/04/bc-stv-and-the-indo-canadian-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 07:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-Canadian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punjabi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>BC-STV and the Indo-Canadian vote My first of three short articles regarding BC-STV Before the referendum on May 6th. This article is about electioneering, a discipline that is absolutely despicable but also unfortunately very efficient! There is a general negative attitude towards BC-STV in the Indo-Canadian community.  The reason comes from an association of the <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/04/bc-stv-and-the-indo-canadian-vote/#more-243" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BC-STV and the Indo-Canadian vote My first of three short articles regarding BC-STV Before the referendum on May 6th. This article is about electioneering, a discipline that is absolutely despicable but also unfortunately very efficient! There is a general negative attitude towards BC-STV in the Indo-Canadian community.  The reason comes from an association of the <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/04/bc-stv-and-the-indo-canadian-vote/#more-243" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/04/bc-stv-and-the-indo-canadian-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On May 12</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/15/on-may-12/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/15/on-may-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 03:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My latest comment published in today&#8217;s 24hrs newspaper.  It is an unusually very neutral comment from myself. On May 12, the referendum on electoral reform will be more important than the election itself. The election will impact us for the next few years; the referendum will impact us for the next few decades at the <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/15/on-may-12/#more-236" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My latest comment published in today&#8217;s 24hrs newspaper.  It is an unusually very neutral comment from myself. On May 12, the referendum on electoral reform will be more important than the election itself. The election will impact us for the next few years; the referendum will impact us for the next few decades at the <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/15/on-may-12/#more-236" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/15/on-may-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BC-STV could get rid of by-elections!</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/10/bc-stv-could-get-rid-of-by-elections/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/10/bc-stv-could-get-rid-of-by-elections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[by-elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Every time there is a by-election, I hear people saying the same thing: &#8220;How much is this going to cost?&#8221;. I usually respond: &#8220;democracy has a price, and that price is less onerous than a &#8220;free&#8221; dictatorship&#8221;. But that being said, is there a way to mitigate the costs related to an election? Right now, <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/10/bc-stv-could-get-rid-of-by-elections/#more-222" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time there is a by-election, I hear people saying the same thing: &#8220;How much is this going to cost?&#8221;. I usually respond: &#8220;democracy has a price, and that price is less onerous than a &#8220;free&#8221; dictatorship&#8221;. But that being said, is there a way to mitigate the costs related to an election? Right now, <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/10/bc-stv-could-get-rid-of-by-elections/#more-222" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/10/bc-stv-could-get-rid-of-by-elections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

