<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Everybody&#039;s Wrong But Me &#187; STV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.vancf.net/tag/stv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.vancf.net</link>
	<description>Ideas &#38; ideals of a Progressive French Canadian living on the West Coast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 15:08:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Christy Clark on BC-STV</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/11/christy-clark-on-bc-stv/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/11/christy-clark-on-bc-stv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:51:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If you just have one thing to watch before making your mind on the referendum, I recommend Christy Clark&#8217;s comment.  It is available here on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhccpzI4lbQ If you can&#8217;t see the video, the text is available on cknw&#8217;s website here: http://www.cknw.com/blog/christys_bc_15/blogentry.aspx?BlogEntryID=10031397 Frédéric Van Caenegem</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you just have one thing to watch before making your mind on the referendum, I recommend Christy Clark&#8217;s comment.  It is available here on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhccpzI4lbQ If you can&#8217;t see the video, the text is available on cknw&#8217;s website here: http://www.cknw.com/blog/christys_bc_15/blogentry.aspx?BlogEntryID=10031397 Frédéric Van Caenegem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/11/christy-clark-on-bc-stv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Watch this before you vote!</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/08/watch-this-before-you-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/08/watch-this-before-you-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 19:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christy Clark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Before you vote, watch this video and tell all your friends: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhccpzI4lbQ Few have been as honest and insightful as former Deputy Premier Christy Clark on CKNW yesterday. Here’s the video everybody needs to see before they vote in Tuesday’s provincial referendum. As Christy says, this is the most important vote we’ll cast. Please forward <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/08/watch-this-before-you-vote/#more-256" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before you vote, watch this video and tell all your friends: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhccpzI4lbQ Few have been as honest and insightful as former Deputy Premier Christy Clark on CKNW yesterday. Here’s the video everybody needs to see before they vote in Tuesday’s provincial referendum. As Christy says, this is the most important vote we’ll cast. Please forward <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/08/watch-this-before-you-vote/#more-256" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/08/watch-this-before-you-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>STV vs MMP</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/07/stv-vs-mmp/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/07/stv-vs-mmp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The second of three short text about the upcoming referendum. Some MMP supporter say vote no for STV, because we are going to have instead a supposedly better system in MMP. While I certainly respect that some people may prefer MMP to STV, I urge voters to actually vote regarding the two systems proposed on <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/07/stv-vs-mmp/#more-252" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second of three short text about the upcoming referendum. Some MMP supporter say vote no for STV, because we are going to have instead a supposedly better system in MMP. While I certainly respect that some people may prefer MMP to STV, I urge voters to actually vote regarding the two systems proposed on <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/07/stv-vs-mmp/#more-252" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/07/stv-vs-mmp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Studies 11</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/05/social-studies-11/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/05/social-studies-11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 06:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A student asked me a few questions about BC-STV for her Social Studies 11 course a few days ago. Here were my answers! &gt; When you first time heard about BC-STV? In 2004, when the Citizens&#8217; Assembly on Electoral Reform (http://www.citizensassembly.bc.ca/) decided that STV should be used for British Columbia. I didn&#8217;t follow that much <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/05/social-studies-11/#more-247" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A student asked me a few questions about BC-STV for her Social Studies 11 course a few days ago. Here were my answers! &gt; When you first time heard about BC-STV? In 2004, when the Citizens&#8217; Assembly on Electoral Reform (http://www.citizensassembly.bc.ca/) decided that STV should be used for British Columbia. I didn&#8217;t follow that much <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/05/social-studies-11/#more-247" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/05/social-studies-11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BC-STV and the Indo-Canadian vote</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/04/bc-stv-and-the-indo-canadian-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/04/bc-stv-and-the-indo-canadian-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 07:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-Canadian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punjabi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>BC-STV and the Indo-Canadian vote My first of three short articles regarding BC-STV Before the referendum on May 6th. This article is about electioneering, a discipline that is absolutely despicable but also unfortunately very efficient! There is a general negative attitude towards BC-STV in the Indo-Canadian community.  The reason comes from an association of the <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/04/bc-stv-and-the-indo-canadian-vote/#more-243" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BC-STV and the Indo-Canadian vote My first of three short articles regarding BC-STV Before the referendum on May 6th. This article is about electioneering, a discipline that is absolutely despicable but also unfortunately very efficient! There is a general negative attitude towards BC-STV in the Indo-Canadian community.  The reason comes from an association of the <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/04/bc-stv-and-the-indo-canadian-vote/#more-243" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/05/04/bc-stv-and-the-indo-canadian-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On May 12</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/15/on-may-12/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/15/on-may-12/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 03:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My latest comment published in today&#8217;s 24hrs newspaper.  It is an unusually very neutral comment from myself. On May 12, the referendum on electoral reform will be more important than the election itself. The election will impact us for the next few years; the referendum will impact us for the next few decades at the <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/15/on-may-12/#more-236" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My latest comment published in today&#8217;s 24hrs newspaper.  It is an unusually very neutral comment from myself. On May 12, the referendum on electoral reform will be more important than the election itself. The election will impact us for the next few years; the referendum will impact us for the next few decades at the <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/15/on-may-12/#more-236" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/15/on-may-12/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BC-STV could get rid of by-elections!</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/10/bc-stv-could-get-rid-of-by-elections/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/10/bc-stv-could-get-rid-of-by-elections/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 06:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[by-elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[referendum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Every time there is a by-election, I hear people saying the same thing: &#8220;How much is this going to cost?&#8221;. I usually respond: &#8220;democracy has a price, and that price is less onerous than a &#8220;free&#8221; dictatorship&#8221;. But that being said, is there a way to mitigate the costs related to an election? Right now, <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/10/bc-stv-could-get-rid-of-by-elections/#more-222" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time there is a by-election, I hear people saying the same thing: &#8220;How much is this going to cost?&#8221;. I usually respond: &#8220;democracy has a price, and that price is less onerous than a &#8220;free&#8221; dictatorship&#8221;. But that being said, is there a way to mitigate the costs related to an election? Right now, <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/10/bc-stv-could-get-rid-of-by-elections/#more-222" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/04/10/bc-stv-could-get-rid-of-by-elections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BC-STV: In 100 words or less</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/03/31/bc-stv-in-100-words-or-less/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/03/31/bc-stv-in-100-words-or-less/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BC-STV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Common Ground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Published in the latest edition of Common Ground: &#8220;Under BC-STV, each person gets to rank candidates in order of preference 1, 2, 3, etc. If your favourite candidate is eliminated, your vote is not wasted; it is simply transferred to your second choice, and so on. No need to vote strategically for the “lesser of <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/03/31/bc-stv-in-100-words-or-less/#more-218" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Published in the latest edition of Common Ground: &#8220;Under BC-STV, each person gets to rank candidates in order of preference 1, 2, 3, etc. If your favourite candidate is eliminated, your vote is not wasted; it is simply transferred to your second choice, and so on. No need to vote strategically for the “lesser of <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/03/31/bc-stv-in-100-words-or-less/#more-218" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/03/31/bc-stv-in-100-words-or-less/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>BC NDP and Electoral Reform &#8211; P4</title>
		<link>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/02/06/bc-ndp-and-electoral-reform-p4/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/02/06/bc-ndp-and-electoral-reform-p4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 07:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Van Caenegem</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Issues & politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carole James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.vancf.net/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My comment to this post: http://challengingthecommonplace.blogspot.com/2009/02/bc-ndp-and-electoral-reform-p4.html By this non-response, Carole James want the referendum to fail. She seem to say that if the yes for BC-STV is under 60%, then an other form of Proportional Representation (like MMP) will be proposed to British Columbians. But, by being vague, she makes no commitments toward this. In <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/02/06/bc-ndp-and-electoral-reform-p4/#more-175" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My comment to this post: http://challengingthecommonplace.blogspot.com/2009/02/bc-ndp-and-electoral-reform-p4.html By this non-response, Carole James want the referendum to fail. She seem to say that if the yes for BC-STV is under 60%, then an other form of Proportional Representation (like MMP) will be proposed to British Columbians. But, by being vague, she makes no commitments toward this. In <a href="http://blog.vancf.net/2009/02/06/bc-ndp-and-electoral-reform-p4/#more-175" class="more-link">Continue reading &rarr;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.vancf.net/2009/02/06/bc-ndp-and-electoral-reform-p4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

